Difference between revisions of "Summerschool Aachen 2004/Network Reconnaissance Lab"
Mario Manno (talk | contribs) m (added pre for C0DE) |
(→Notes on Lab Session) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Notes on Presentations == | == Notes on Presentations == | ||
+ | === Fingerprinting === | ||
+ | We also worked on our mandatory assignemt. Our idea was basically first to parse the http://cr.yp.to/surveys/dns1.html page with a perl script and load the fingerprints into our | ||
+ | datastructure, into which also the fingerprints of the ftp and smtp servers were to be loaded. | ||
+ | We planed to use the already implemented functions which computed the fingerprint of a server and pipe | ||
+ | their output to our script and compare it with the stored values in our datastructure. | ||
+ | When calling our script the user was expected to give it as a parameter value n and our script was supposed to | ||
+ | output for the best n matches of our fingerprint with the fingerprints stored in our datastructure the name of the corresponding server. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[Samad Nasserian]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== Notes on Lab Session == | == Notes on Lab Session == | ||
Revision as of 19:45, 27 September 2004
Contents
Notes on Presentations
Fingerprinting
We also worked on our mandatory assignemt. Our idea was basically first to parse the http://cr.yp.to/surveys/dns1.html page with a perl script and load the fingerprints into our datastructure, into which also the fingerprints of the ftp and smtp servers were to be loaded. We planed to use the already implemented functions which computed the fingerprint of a server and pipe their output to our script and compare it with the stored values in our datastructure. When calling our script the user was expected to give it as a parameter value n and our script was supposed to output for the best n matches of our fingerprint with the fingerprints stored in our datastructure the name of the corresponding server.
Notes on Lab Session
SNMP Reconnaissance
This is a placeholder for the results of the SNMP scanning I've been doing, but here's a list of default passwords that others might find useful
Fingerprinting
So we gave out some mandatory work for today. It was considered boring and frustrating by most and they considered all other possibilities more entertaining. Is that a patter about the grass being greener elsewhere? Alexander seemed to consider the requirement of doing something he doesn't enjoy for a whole afternoon to hard and left without notice. I'm disappointed about that.
To find out if the task was really unbearable I sat down myself and implemented what I asked for. The basic parser was quickly done:
def loadFingerprints(self): # seek list of probes for l in sys.stdin: if 'Here are the DNS packets sent by the surveying program:' in l: break for l in sys.stdin: if l.startswith('<tr><td align=right>'): fields = l.split('<td>') # this IS exploiutable tests.append((eval(fields[1].strip('</>tdtr')), fields[2].strip('</>tdtr</td></tr>\n'))) if '</table>' in l: break # seek list of probes for l in sys.stdin: if not l.startswith('<tr><td>'): continue if l.startswith('<tr><td>Software</td>'): continue probes.append([x.replace('</td>', '').replace('tr>', '').strip(' </\n') for x in l.split('<td>')])
Crude, but works. Mostly. I get entries like
[, 'BIND 9.2', '4q', '5', '5', '1q', '2', '1q', '1q', '1q', '1q', '3AA', '0AA', '3AA', '3AA', '3AA', '3AA', '3AA', '4q', '4q', '4q', '3AA', '3AA', '5', '0AAD, 2, 5']
that is fine, but others are not
[, '1', '1', 't', 't', 't', 't', 't', 't', '1', 't', '0', 't', '0', '15', '0Z0', '0', '0', 't', 't', 't', '0', '0', 't', '4']
I decided to leave that problem for later.
Scaning was easy now:
def scanTargets(self, targetlist, timeout=1): for target in targetlist: s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) s.settimeout(timeout) s.connect((target, 53)) for test, desc in tests: flags = [] reply = None retries = 5 while 1: print 'sending %r ...' %test, s.send(test) try: reply = s.recv(1500) print repr(reply) break except socket.timeout: print "timeout" retries -= 1 if retries < 0: flags.append('t') break if reply: flags.extend(self.checkFlags(reply)) print "xxx", flags
I did parse the response:
def checkFlags(self, reply): flags = [] u = DNS.Lib.Munpacker(reply) r = DNS.Lib.DnsResult(u, []) # check RCODE flags.append(r.header['rcode']) if r.header['tc']: flags.append('TC') if r.header['rd']: flags.append('RD') if r.header['aa']: flags.append('AA') if r.answers: flags.append('D') if len(r.questions) == 0: flags.append('q') if len(r.questions) == 0: flags.append('Q2') # X is missing # print vars(r) return flags
But I failed to implement matching against the fingerprints database. I also got far to much timeouts to my DNS queries. I didn't investigate further. :-(
-- MaxDornseif